Page 21 - br-sep-2021
P. 21

September 2021                      September 2021
       the  higher  of  either  the  baseline  household  growth  figure  or  the  most  recently
 Cycling in Summer ‘85   adopted housing requirement figure. It did not therefore apply to this calculation.
       Dorset does not contain one of the ‘top 20 cities and urban areas’ that qualify for
 Oh the joys of cycling, travelling on a bike;   the additional 35% uplift and therefore this was not applied.
 Riding through the countryside, something that we like.
 Though our bikes had sat there, we took them from the garage:   Local Plan – revised timescale
 With the sun so inviting, who needs a car or carriage?
       The timetable has been revised because of the extremely large response to the
       initial  consultation  plus  a  series  of  questions  requiring  further  work,  by  the
 We packed up sandwiches and a few cans of drink   government Inspector. The revised (aspirational) plan is as follows
 Then set off for Swanage (It’s further than we think!)
 We admired the view at Sandbanks, then onto the ferry.      Publication of response analysis January 2022
 Though we’re getting older we felt quite fit and merry.      Cabinet March 2022
           Consultation May 2022
 Pedalling in the lanes we saw honeysuckle and rose,
 And then fragrant orchids, the first we’d seen of those:      Responses and analysis Summer 2022
 A flash of green woodpecker, and swallows on the wing.      Cabinet September 2022
 We enjoyed the summer breeze, the sun and everything.   Submission late 2022
       
 We enjoyed it as much as the car – and of course it’s cheaper.   Once the plan is submitted the timetable will be almost entirely dependent on the
 The only trouble was the hills – has time made them steeper?   Inspector, but we are still aiming for agreement by early 2024.
 And coming home later, in welcome shade of trees,
 I felt unaccustomed stiffness in my joints and knees.   Community Governance Review (CGR)

 Now sitting back at home, in spite of aches and pain,   As a reminder, the areas that CGRs cover are:
 When the sun comes out tomorrow, we’ll cycle off again.      Creating, merging, altering or abolishing parishes (grouping or de-grouping
 Maybe you could try the same, or else try a hike,   parishes)
 Or answer the call of Tebbit’s Law and ‘Get on yer bike’.      Increasing or decreasing the number of Councillors

 Eileen Richardson      Creating ward boundaries or changing existing Warding arrangements
           Changes to Parish names

           Correcting minor boundary anomalies.
           Changing a parish council into a parish meeting
       The responsibility of undertaking CGRs falls to the principal council (Dorset Council
       in this case) and can be triggered in a number of ways including a request from a
       parish,  a  community  petition  or,  as  in  this  case,  at  the  principal  council’s
       volition.    As  a  principal  council,  we  are  required  to  undertake  a  review  of
       governance arrangements of all parishes every 10-15 years and Full Council on 15
       July  agreed  that  now  was  the  appropriate  time  to  carry  out  a  council-wide
       review.   The legislation that covers CGRs requires any Review to be completed

 56                                          21
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26